Abstract:
Central government matching grants can, in principle, induce socially- efficient provision of local public goods that produce spillover benefits. Local underprovision of public goods may however elicit direct central-government provision and finance (a ``bailout") that makes local residents better off than under grant-subsidized local provision; local underprovision that induces bailouts reveals the local budget constraint to be ``soft." Simulations suggest that the ability of a locality to extract a welfare-improving bailout depends positively on its size: budget constraints are more likely to be ``hard" for small localities.
Keywords:fiscal; federalism; intergovernmental; transfers (search for similar items in EconPapers) JEL-codes:D6D7H (search for similar items in EconPapers) New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pbe Date: 2001-12-10 Note: Type of Document - ; prepared on TeX; figures: request from author View list of references