EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Dynamic Enfranchisement

William Jack and Roger Lagunoff ()
Additional contact information
William Jack: Georgetown University

Public Economics from EconWPA

Abstract: Why would a political elite voluntarily dilute its political power by extending the voting franchise? This paper develops a dynamic recursive framework for studying voter enfranchisement. We specify a class of dynamic games in which political rights evolve over time. Each period, private decisions of citizens co-mingle with government policies to act upon a state variable such as a capital stock, a public good, or the likelihood of an insurrection. Policies are determined by a pivotal decision maker in a potentially restricted franchise. The pivotal decision maker can also delegate decision authority to a new decision maker in the subsequent period. We describe conditions under which an equilibrium of this "dictator delegation game" corresponds to a majority vote decision by the enfranchised group to expand the set of citizens with voting rights. Under these conditions, each period's pivotal decision maker is a median voter who can designate authority to a new median of a larger voting franchise in the next period. We characterize the equilibria by their Euler equations. In certain games, the equilibria generate paths that display a gradual, sometimes uneven history of enfranchisement that is roughly consistent with observed patterns of extensions. Our main result shows that extensions of the franchise occur in a given period \emph{if and only if} the private decisions of the citizenry have a net positive spillover to the dynamic payoff of the current median voter. The size of the extension depends on the size of the spillover. Since the class of games we study can accommodate a number of proposed explanations for franchise extension (e.g., the threat of insurrection, or ideological or class conflict within the elite, etc), the result suggests a common causal mechanism for these seemingly different explanations. We describe a number of parametric environments that correspond to the various explanations, and show how the mechanism works in each.

Keywords: Dynamic games; voter enfranchisement; franchise extension equilibria; dictator delegation game (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C73 D72 D78 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003-06-05, Revised 2003-11-24
Note: Type of Document - pdf; prepared on IBM PC; to print on PostScript; pages: 36 ; figures: included
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/pe/papers/0306/0306002.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Dynamic Enfranchisement (2004) Downloads
Working Paper: Dynamic Enfranchisement (2004) Downloads
Working Paper: Dynamic Enfranchisement (2003) Downloads
Working Paper: Dynamic Enfrachisement Downloads
Working Paper: Dynamic Enfranchisement (2003) Downloads
Journal Article: Dynamic enfranchisement (2006) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwppe:0306002

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Public Economics from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().

 
Page updated 2009-11-24
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwppe:0306002