How the President and Senate Affect the Balance of Power in the

Gisela Sin and Arthur Lupia ()
Additional contact information
Gisela Sin: University of Michigan

Public Economics from EconWPA

Abstract: Can the President or the Senate affect the balance of power in the House? We find that they can. Our answer comes from a model that links House leadership decisions to the constitutional requirement to build lawmaking coalitions with the Senate and President. Changing the ideal point of a non-House actor, while holding constant the ideal point of all House members, can alter the House’s balance of power. Power shifts because changes in the Senate or President can reshape the set of achievable legislative outcomes, which, in turn, alters the bargaining power of key House members. A corollary clarifies when empowering preference outliers (policy extremists) in the House leads to legislative outcomes that moderates prefer. Overall, our theory clarifies how constitutional requirements induce House members to make different leadership decisions than they would if they were, as commonly represented, unaware of other chambers or branches of government.

Keywords: congress; bargaining; legislative bargaining; collective action (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D6 D7 H (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pbe
Date: 2005-10-05
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 45
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/pe/papers/0510/0510007.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwppe:0510007

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Public Economics from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().