Urban Productivity and Factor Growth in the Late Nineteenth Century

Raphael Bostic, Joshua Gans () and Scott Stern
Additional contact information
Raphael Bostic: Stanford
Scott Stern: Sloan

Urban/Regional from EconWPA

Abstract: This paper uncovers a series of empirical facts regarding the sources of U.S. urban growth in the 1880s. We use a large theoretical literature to provide motivations for a number of potential sources of growth, particularly those based on geographical proximity externalities. These sources are characterised and linked to empirical proxies. Then we estimate the covariation of these empirical proxies with the growth rate in output, capital and labor respectively. We find that traditional (neoclassical), several geographic externality, and socio-political factors all covary significantly with aggregate growth, though in very specific ways. For example, the size of a city (a measure of the degree of urbanization) is uncorrelated with output growth, positively correlated with labor growth, and negatively correlated with capital growth. No one extant theory of growth accounts simultaneously for all the phenomena that we observe.

JEL-codes: R (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1995-07-07
Note: 27 pages, postscript file
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/urb/papers/9507/9507001.ps.gz (application/postscript)

Related works:
Working Paper: Urban Productivity and Factor Growth in the Late Nineteenth Century (1995)
Journal Article: Urban Productivity and Factor Growth in the Late Nineteenth Century (1997)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpur:9507001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Urban/Regional from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().