Is Partial Tax Harmonization Desirable?

Paola Conconi (), Carlo Perroni and Raymond G. Riezman

The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) from University of Warwick, Department of Economics

Abstract: We consider a setting in which capital taxation is characterized by two distortions working in opposite directions. On one hand, governments engage in tax competition and are tempted to lower capital tax rates. On the other hand, they are unable to commit to future policies and, once capital has been installed, have incentives to increase taxes. In this setting, there exists a tax that optimally trades off the two distortions. We compare three possible tax harmonization scenarios: no tax harmonization (all countries set taxes unilaterally), global tax harmonization (all countries coordinate their capital taxes), and partial tax harmonization (only a subset of all countries coordinate capital taxes). We show that, if capital is sufficiently mobile, partial tax harmonization benefits all countries compared to both global and no harmonization.

Keywords: Tax Competition; Commitment; Partial Coordination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H21 F21 C73 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pbe
Date: 2007
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear ... ations/twerp_795.pdf

Related works:
Working Paper: Is Partial Tax Harmonization Desirable? (2006)
Journal Article: Is partial tax harmonization desirable (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wrk:warwec:795

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) from University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Margaret Nash ().