Abstract:
We model and compare the bargaining process between a purchaser of health services, such as a health authority, and a provider (the hospital) in three plausible scenarios: a) the purchaser sets the price, and activity is bargained between the purchaser and the provider: activity bargaining; b) the price is bargained between the purchaser and the provider, but activity is chosen unilaterally by the provider: price bargaining; c) price and activity are simultaneously bargained between the purchaser and the provider: efficient bargaining. We show that: 1) if the bargaining power of the purchaser is high (low), efficient bargaining leads to higher (lower) activity and purchaser's utility, and lower (higher) prices and provider's utility compared to price bargaining. 2) In activity bargaining, prices are lowest, the purchaser's utility is highest and the provider's utility is lowest; activity is generally lowest, but higher than in price bargaining for high bargaining power of the purchaser. 3) If the purchaser has higher bargaining power, this reduces prices and activity in price bargaining, it reduces prices but increases activity in activity bargaining, and it reduces prices but has no effect on activity in efficient bargaining.
More papers in Discussion Papers from Department of Economics, University of York Address: Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Michael Shallcross ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .