Economists, Incentives, Judgment, and Empirical Work

David Colander ()

No 2008-12, Economics Discussion Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy

Abstract: This paper asks the question: Why has the ?general-to-specific? cointegrated VAR approach as developed in Europe had only limited success in the US as a tool for doing empirical macroeconomics, where what might be called a ?theory comes first? approach dominates? The reason this paper highlights is the incompatibility of the European approach with the US focus on the journal publication metric for advancement. Specifically, the European ?general-to specific? cointegrated VAR approach requires researcher judgment to be part of the analysis, and the US focus on a journal publication metric discourages such research methods. The US ?theory comes first? approach fits much better with the journal publication metric. --

Keywords: Incentives; empirical work; econometrics; methodology; cointegration; VAR (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cba, nep-ecm, nep-hpe, nep-pke and nep-sog
Date: 2008
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2008-12 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Economists, Incentives, Judgement and Empirical Work (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:ifwedp:7213

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Discussion Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by ZBW - German National Library for Economics ().