Comparative Analysis of ESG Performance among ASEAN Firms: Evidence from Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Indonesia

Raja Adzrin Raja Ahmad, Wan Imran Daniel Aminurrashid, Siti Rahayu Sarman, Zarina Abu Bakar and Nor Balkish Zakaria
Additional contact information
Raja Adzrin Raja Ahmad: Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Johor, Kampus Segamat; Accounting Research Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor
Wan Imran Daniel Aminurrashid: Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Johor, Kampus Segamat
Siti Rahayu Sarman: Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Johor, Kampus Segamat
Zarina Abu Bakar: Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Johor, Kampus Segamat
Nor Balkish Zakaria: Accounting Research Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 2025, vol. 9, issue 10, 3717-3730

Abstract: This study examines the comparative Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance of firms in four ASEAN economies; Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Indonesia from 2019 to 2023. Using secondary data obtained from Refinitiv Eikon Datastream, the analysis covers a final sample of 758 listed firms, representing 3,790 firm-year observations. The study employs a descriptive analytical approach to explore cross-country, temporal, and sectoral variations in ESG performance. The general findings show that ESG performance in ASEAN has improved steadily over the five-year period, though the rate and consistency differ among nations. Thailand continues to lead in both average ESG scores and reporting uniformity, reflecting strong regulatory frameworks and institutional support. Indonesia demonstrates sustained progress, possibly driven by sustainability regulations and the growing influence of the Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Singapore maintains a stable yet moderate performance, consistent with its adherence to global standards such as the GRI and TCFD frameworks. Malaysia, however, exhibits a gradual decline in ESG scores and higher variability, suggesting uneven ESG adoption and differences in disclosure quality across sectors. Sectoral analysis indicates that Energy, Financials, and Industrials outperform Consumer and Technology industries, underscoring the role of regulatory enforcement and environmental exposure. Overall, the study concludes that ASEAN's ESG landscape is evolving positively but remains fragmented, highlighting the need for stronger regional harmonisation to enhance comparability, transparency, and sustainable growth.

Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ ... -3730-202511_pdf.pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ ... iland-and-indonesia/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:3717-3730

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science is currently edited by Dr. Nidhi Malhan

More articles in International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science from International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Pawan Verma ().