The â€œBelt and Road Initiativeâ€ and comparative regional productivity in China
John Gibson () and
Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, 2018, vol. 5, issue 2, 168-181
We study potential internal effects of China's Belt and Road Initiative. These effects may occur sooner than the international effects, since they face no delay from partner negotiations and from financing and security concerns. For a key part of the overland Silk Road Economic Belt, we identify 46 prefecturalâ€ level units in a corridor from the Chinaâ€“Kazakh border to Xi'an that are likely to see increased investment and economic activity from Belt and Road. These units are smaller, more diverse, poorer, and less productive than are prefecturalâ€ level units in the rest of China. The Belt and Road Initiative will disperse some economic activity to places that the market would not direct it, such as to this corridor. Given that these areas are less productive and are likely to have lower absorptive capacity, investments here will have an efficiency cost since they should yield more GDP if deployed elsewhere in China.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: The â€œBelt and Road Initiativeâ€ and comparative regional productivity in China (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:5:y:2018:i:2:p:168-181
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=2050-2680
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().