Competing for Foreign Direct Investment
Pedro Barros () and
Luis Cabral ()
Review of International Economics, 2000, vol. 8, issue 2, 360-71
The paper analyzes "subsidy games" between countries in order to attract foreign direct investment (FDI) from a third country. The winner of this game results from the interaction of two factors, relative country size and employment gains from FDI: a large (or "central") country is more likely to attract FDI, and so is a country with high unemployment. The subsidy equilibrium is compared with two alternative solutions: zero subsidies and first-best subsidies. It is shown that total welfare may be greater under subsidy competition than under zero subsidies: the gains from efficient location implied by subsidy competition may more than outweigh the losses from higher subsidies. Moreover, departing from subsidy competition to zero subsidies or to first-best subsidies (without side payments) implies a gain to one country and a loss to the other. This suggests that it may be difficult to reach a consensus to move away from the status quo of subsidy competition. Copyright 2000 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (59) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent ... &year=2000&part=null link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:reviec:v:8:y:2000:i:2:p:360-71
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0965-7576
Access Statistics for this article
Review of International Economics is currently edited by E. Kwan Choi
More articles in Review of International Economics from Wiley Blackwell
Series data maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().