Why We Should Keep Studying Good (and Everyday) Participation: An Analogy to Political Participation
Additional contact information
Neta Kligler-Vilenchik: Department of Communication and Journalism, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Media and Communication, 2018, vol. 6, issue 4, 111-114
Research on participation is currently characterized by a trend towards studying its “darker” sides. In this commentary, I make an argument for why we should keep studying good participation. In addition, I claim that the flipside of studying exceptional case studies of participation shouldn’t be only focusing on dark participation, but on everyday, mundane forms of participation, that may happen in surprising contexts (such as non-proprietary platforms) and may take different shapes. To make these claims, I introduce a case study of “good participation” in news production processes, and explain why it may merit this distinction. I then use a three-pronged analogy to the cognate field of political participation to show what it can tell us about good—and everyday—participation in the news.
Keywords: citizen; journalism; dark; participation; everyday; participation; good; participation; news; participatory; journalism; political; participation; social; media (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:meanco:v:6:y:2018:i:4:p:111-114
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Media and Communication from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira ().