Economics at your fingertips  

Different Types of Data and the Validity of Democracy Measures

Svend-Erik Skaaning
Additional contact information
Svend-Erik Skaaning: Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Denmark

Politics and Governance, 2018, vol. 6, issue 1, 105-116

Abstract: Different measures of democracy rely on different types of data. Some exclusively rely on observational data, others rely on judgement-based data in the form of in-house coded indicators or expert surveys. A third set of democracy measures combines information from indicators based on different types of data, some of them also data from representative surveys of the mass public. This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these different types of data for the measurement of electoral and liberal democracy. The discussion is based on the premise that the main priorities must be to establish a high degree of concept-measure consistency, i.e. indicators capture relevant aspects of the core concept of interest in a precise and unbiased manner, and to provide high coverage. The basic argument of the article is that no type of data is superior to others in all respects. The article draws on examples from extant datasets to illustrate the tradeoffs and it offers suggestions about how to reduce some of the potential drawbacks.

Keywords: democracy; measuring; democracy; reliability; types; of; data; validity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Series data maintained by António Vieira ().

Page updated 2018-03-24
Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:105-116