From Walker Process to In re DDAVP: Should Direct Purchasers Have Antitrust Standing in Walker Process Claims?
Antitrust Chronicle, 2008, vol. 11
In In re : DDAVP Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, decided in 2006, the district court held that direct purchasers of a product from a monopolist which secured its monopoly by fraud on the Patent Office do not have standing to bring a Walker Process claim.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/from ... alker-process-claims (application/pdf)
Requires login and subscription
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpi:atchrn:11.2.2008:i=5172
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Antitrust Chronicle from Competition Policy International
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lindsay McSweeney (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .