Vertical Restraints: A Look Ahead
Paulo da Silveira,
Vinicius Marques de Carvalho and
Marcos Paulo Verissimo
CPI Journal, 2013, vol. 9
Vinicius Marques de Carvalho, Marcos Paulo Verissimo, and Paulo Burnier da SilveiraÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s paper argues for an administrable standard to analyze vertical restraints. They consider that the discussion of whether these types of conducts ought to be reviewed under a rule of reason or per se approach is mostly academic and not helpful for authorities. They note that Ã¢â‚¬Å“competition analyses will always make some sort of rule of reason approach. What may radically change is how to weigh the presumption of legality, or illegality, of a particular conduct.Ã¢â‚¬Â Based on a recent 2013 RPM case by CADE, they suggest that these conducts should be considered presumably illegal and that the burden of proof about their likely efficiencies be shifted to the defendants.
JEL-codes: G38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Requires login and subscription
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpi:cpijrn:9.1.2013:i=11543
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in CPI Journal from Competition Policy International
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lindsay McSweeney ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).