“Pay-for-Delayâ€Â: What Do We Disagree On?

Pierre Regibeau ()

CPI Journal, 2013, vol. 9

Abstract: Antitrust concerns about “pay-for-delay†patent settlements are based on two theories of harms, one that stresses the need for courts to review the validity of patents and one that emphasizes the “probabilistic†nature of patent rights. Pierre Regibeau (CRA and Imperial College).

Keywords: pay-for-delay; antitrust; pierre regibeau; competition law (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/pay- ... -do-we-disagree-on-2 (application/pdf)
Requires login and subscription

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpi:cpijrn:9.2.2013:i=13222

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in CPI Journal from Competition Policy International
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lindsay McSweeney ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).