Do Economists Reach a Conclusion on Household and Municipal Recycling?
Econ Journal Watch, 2007, vol. 4, issue 1, 83-111
Do economists reach a conclusion on household and municipal recycling? I explore the policy judgments of published economists on recycling and find that there is no broad consensus. The mainstream recycling literature is dominated by a guided-market approach; taxes and subsidies are advocated to correct for market failures. There are two less popular but still significant approaches: a minimal government laissez faire approach and a command and control regulatory approach. Laissez faire economists advocate little or no government intervention in recycling and waste management markets. Command and control economists usually advocate mandatory recycling and regulation. The paper concludes with a brief critique of the interventionist policies.
Keywords: Recycling; solid waste; economists; methodology of economics; property rights (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q53 Q58 B41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://econjwatch.org/File+download/136/2007-01-g ... ncl.pdf?mimetype=pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ejw:journl:v:4:y:2007:i:1:p:83-111
Access Statistics for this article
Econ Journal Watch is currently edited by Daniel Klein
More articles in Econ Journal Watch from Econ Journal Watch Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jason Briggeman ().