Assessment of Potential of Organic Waste Methane for Implementation in Energy Self-Sufficient Wastewater Treatment Facilities

Pawel Marczewski, Katarzyna Sytek-Szmeichel and Monika Zubrowska-Sudol ()
Additional contact information
Pawel Marczewski: Department of Water and Wastewater Systems, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 20, 00-653 Warsaw, Poland
Katarzyna Sytek-Szmeichel: Department of Water and Wastewater Systems, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 20, 00-653 Warsaw, Poland
Monika Zubrowska-Sudol: Department of Water and Wastewater Systems, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 20, 00-653 Warsaw, Poland

Energies, 2025, vol. 18, issue 20, 1-18

Abstract: The water sector faces a dual challenge: reducing energy consumption and carbon footprint while improving wastewater treatment efficiency. Anaerobic digestion (AD) remains the primary method for energy recovery in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). To enhance methane production and move toward carbon neutrality, co-digestion of sewage sludge with external substrates is gaining attention. This study evaluated nine organic substrates for their methane potential using the standardized Automatic Methane Potential Test System (AMPTS). The highest methane yield was obtained from sediment from a wine tank, reaching 1387 NmL CH 4 /g VS, followed by yeast slurry, with 524 NmL CH 4 /g VS. These values were over 6 and 2.5 times higher, respectively, compared to the methane potential of conventional mixed municipal sludge. Apple pomace, whey, food biowaste, and herbal maceration waste showed moderate improvements (301–388 NmL CH 4 /gVS). When considering methane yield per gram of wet substrate, herbal maceration waste was the most efficient. A techno-economic analysis revealed that this substrate consistently achieved a net-positive energy balance (up to 170%) in large WWTPs, even at transport distances of 50 km. Other substrates also showed high potential, covering nearly 100% of energy demand under optimal conditions. In contrast, whey showed limited applicability due to transport constraints. These findings highlight the importance of substrate selection, particularly in practical efforts aimed at achieving energy self-sufficiency in wastewater treatment plants. It also provides WWTP operators with clear and practical insights into enhancing methane yields from anaerobic digesters while minimizing the risk of process inhibition.

Keywords: anaerobic digestion; biochemical methane potential; organic waste; wastewater treatment; sludge management; climate neutrality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q4 Q40 Q41 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 Q49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5534/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/20/5534/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:20:p:5534-:d:1775918

Access Statistics for this article

Energies is currently edited by Ms. Cassie Shen

More articles in Energies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().