EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Tourist Carrying Capacity for Sustainable Development of Gunung Gede Pangrango National Park Ecotourism

Sebastien M. R. Dente (), Ahmad Sopian Pamungkas (), Thi Van Le and Seiji Hashimoto
Additional contact information
Sebastien M. R. Dente: Department of Environmental Management, Organization for Environment, Safety and Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
Ahmad Sopian Pamungkas: Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu 525-8577, Japan
Thi Van Le: Ritsumeikan Global Innovation Research Organization, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu 525-8577, Japan
Seiji Hashimoto: College of Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu 525-8577, Japan

Tourism and Hospitality, 2025, vol. 6, issue 5, 1-19

Abstract: This study presents a comprehensive carrying capacity assessment for Gunung Gede Pangrango National Park (GGPNP), a key biodiversity hotspot in Java, Indonesia, integrating Physical Carrying Capacity (PCC), Real Carrying Capacity (RCC), and social-ecological correction factors. Using a PCC-RCC framework that combines GIS-based slope and land-cover analysis with an online visitor survey (camping n = 34; recreation n = 31) and 2020–2024 visitation statistics, we evaluated sustainable limits for hiking, camping, and recreation. Ecological and social constraints, primarily steep topography (>25% slope) and preferences for uncrowded conditions, reduce effective capacity by 96–99% from theoretical physical limits. The resulting daily RCC thresholds are 210–282 persons for hiking across three main trails, 131–204 for camping, and 803 for recreation, demonstrating that spatial availability is a poor predictor of sustainable capacity. Comparison with 2020–2024 visitation data reveals systemic overuse of the recreation zone on non-working days and pinpoints October as the most critical month. Given the park’s financial constraints, we recommend adopting dynamic visitor limits, developing a fee structure that reflects ecological value and demand, and diversifying revenue streams to mitigate degradation and ensure long-term financial and environmental sustainability.

Keywords: ecotourism; carrying capacity; sustainable tourism; real carrying capacity; Gunung Gede Pangrango National Park; environmental conservation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Z3 Z30 Z31 Z32 Z33 Z38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/6/5/249/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/6/5/249/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:6:y:2025:i:5:p:249-:d:1797731

Access Statistics for this article

Tourism and Hospitality is currently edited by Mr. Philip Li

More articles in Tourism and Hospitality from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-11-27
Handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:6:y:2025:i:5:p:249-:d:1797731