Economics at your fingertips  

The impact of ambiguity and prudence on prevention decisions

Loïc Berger

Theory and Decision, 2016, vol. 80, issue 3, 389-409

Abstract: Abstract Most decisions concerning (self-)insurance and self-protection have to be taken in situations in which (a) the effort exerted precedes the moment uncertainty realizes, and (b) the probabilities of future states of the world are not perfectly known. By integrating these two characteristics in a simple theoretical framework, this paper derives plausible conditions under which ambiguity aversion raises the demand for (self-)insurance and self-protection. In particular, it is shown that in most usual situations where the level of ambiguity does not increase with the level of effort, a simple condition of ambiguity prudence known as decreasing absolute ambiguity aversion (DAAA) is sufficient to give a clear and positive answer to the question: Does ambiguity aversion raise the optimal level of effort?

Keywords: Non-expected utility; Self-protection; Self-insurance; Ambiguity; Prudence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 D81 D91 G11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/11238/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

Theory and Decision is currently edited by Mohammed Abdellaoui

More articles in Theory and Decision from Springer
Series data maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

Page updated 2018-02-15
Handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:80:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-015-9512-1