What Can We Learn from the Real Bills Doctrine?
Juha Tarkka ()
Additional contact information
Juha Tarkka: Bank of Finland, PO Box 160, 00101 Helsinki, Finland
Credit and Capital Markets, 2019, vol. 52, issue 1, 89–113
The historical development of bank liquidity doctrines is surveyed from the real bills doctrine and its antecedents to the present day. The underlying ideas of the succession of several dominant liquidity doctrines are analysed and compared, with attention to their historical contexts and respective weaknesses as exposed by experience. While the real bills doctrine is obsolete as such, its central idea that the liquidity of banks requires their credit to be linked to real income generation in the economy is unique among the different liquidity doctrines and can be useful as the liquidity regulation of banks is now subject to renewed interest.
JEL-codes: B12 B26 G21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kuk:journl:v:52:y:2019:i:1:p:89-113
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Credit and Capital Markets from Credit and Capital Markets
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Credit and Capital Markets ().