An Analysis of Non-Traditional Activities at German Savings Banks – Does the Type of Fee and Commission Income Matter?
Matthias Koehler ()
Additional contact information
Matthias Koehler: Deutsche Bundesbank, Wilhelm-Epstein-Straße 14, 60431 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Credit and Capital Markets, 2019, vol. 52, issue 2, 253-289
In this paper, we use a fully anonymized dataset provided by the German Savings Banks Association (DSGV) to analyse which savings banks have expanded into fee-producing activities more quickly. In addition, we investigate whether their profitability and stability is correlated with the share of their fee and commission income. Notably, we examine whether the effect on bank profitability differs depending on the type of fee and commission income. Our results support the view that savings banks with low net interest margins are under greater pressure to expand into fee-producing activities. They further suggest that savings banks with a higher share of fee and commission income, in particular from payment services and securities business, also have a higher profitability. The Z-score also correlates positively with the share of securities business income, possibly because it responds to different shocks than net interest income and, therefore, offers a large diversification potential.
JEL-codes: G20 G21 G29 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kuk:journl:v:52:y:2019:i:2:p:253-289
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Credit and Capital Markets from Credit and Capital Markets
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Credit and Capital Markets ().