EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Towards the Evaluation of the Ecological Effectiveness of the Principles, Criteria and Indicators (PCI) of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC): Case study in the Arkhangelsk Region in the Russian Federation

Jeanette Silvin Blumroeder, Peter Ralph Hobson, Uli Frank Graebener, Joerg-Andreas Krueger, Denis Dobrynin, Natalya Burova, Irina Amosa, Susanne Winter and Pierre Leonhard Ibisch
Additional contact information
Jeanette Silvin Blumroeder: Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Eberswalde, Germany
Peter Ralph Hobson: Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Eberswalde, Germany
Uli Frank Graebener: Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Eberswalde, Germany
Joerg-Andreas Krueger: Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Eberswalde, Germany
Denis Dobrynin: Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Eberswalde, Germany
Natalya Burova: Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Eberswalde, Germany
Irina Amosa: Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Eberswalde, Germany
Susanne Winter: Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Eberswalde, Germany
Pierre Leonhard Ibisch: Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Eberswalde, Germany

Challenges in Sustainability, 2018, vol. 6, issue 1, 20-51

Abstract: The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) is a voluntary sustainability standard with global reach that has been developed to encourage responsible and sustainable forest management. Despite its broad appeal, there is little scientific assessment to substantiate the effectiveness of FSC in the boreal zone. In this study, an ecosystem-based and participatory approach was applied to a case study in the Arkhangelsk Region of the Russia Federation to assess the potential influence of the principles, criteria and indicators of the Russian FSC standard. An ECOSEFFECT theoretical plausibility analysis was conducted to evaluate the potential effectiveness of FSC in safeguarding the ecological integrity of the ecosystem. Besides spatial analysis and a field visitation, core elements of the methodological procedure were workshops with experts and stakeholders who directly contributed to knowledge mapping and analysis. The results of the study suggest FSC can potentially influence and improve forest management including monitoring and evaluation, foster the institutional capacity, and enhance knowledge on the impacts of forest management. Theoretically, FSC has a certain potential to reduce a range of anthropogenic threats to the ecosystem, such as large-scale deforestation and forest degradation, logging of High Conservation Value Forests, large size of clear-cuts, excessive annual allowable cuts, damage to trees during forest operations, and hydrological changes. However, human-induced fire is the only ecological stress that was assumed to be effectively tackled through a strong and positive influence of FSC. The results of the theoretical analysis with a semi-quantitative evaluation revealed the potential for FSC to generate much more effective outcomes for biodiversity by prudently targeting key ecological problems. The biggest problem is the large-scale clear-cutting practice, especially within IFL. These devastating practices are not promoted by, but are compliant with the current Russian FSC standard. This feeds doubts about the consistency of FSC practice and its credibility.

Keywords: Arkhangelsk; boreal forest; ecological effectiveness; FSC-certification; sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D11 D12 D13 D61 D78 D81 F64 F68 I3 O2 O3 O4 Q R4 Y3 Z1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/article/download/333/pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/article/view/333 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lib:000cis:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:20-51

Access Statistics for this article

Challenges in Sustainability is currently edited by Assoc. Prof. Barry Ness

More articles in Challenges in Sustainability from Librello publishing house
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. José A. F. Monteiro ().

 
Page updated 2018-09-29
Handle: RePEc:lib:000cis:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:20-51