EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Differences in Kinetics and Coordination between Walking Barefoot and Walking in Rocker Bottom Shoes

William R. Barfield, Miriam Klous, Jennie Engel and Grace Altman
Additional contact information
William R. Barfield: Department of Health & Human Performance-College of Charleston-Charleston, SC; Department of Orthopaedics-Medical University of South Carolina-Charleston, SC, USA
Miriam Klous: Department of Health & Human Performance-College of Charleston-Charleston, SC, USA
Jennie Engel: Department of Health & Human Performance-College of Charleston-Charleston, SC, USA
Grace Altman: Department of Health & Human Performance-College of Charleston-Charleston, SC, USA

Journal of Sports Research, 2015, vol. 2, issue 3, 77-88

Abstract: Different types of shoe constructions have been developed with an unstable base including rocker bottom shoes (RBS). RBS were developed to mimic barefoot (BF) walking. Studies have compared walking in RBS with walking in conventional shoes (CS) or running in CS with BF running. The purpose of the current study was to compare RBS with BF walking to describe differences in selected kinetic variables and their timing between the two conditions. Three-dimensional ground reaction force (GRF) and kinematic data for the lower extremities were recorded for 13 college age females during gait at self-selected speed. Similar results were observed between BF walking and walking in RBS. However, several of the observed characteristics of RBS walking were similar to characteristics reported in CS walking. Walking in RBS showed greater vertical GRF (loading response) and anterior-posterior GRF (braking force) than BF walking. Earlier transition from deceleration to acceleration phase was observed in RBS condition, and a shorter time between the peak in ankle plantar flexion moment and the push-of-peak of vertical GRF, and acceleration force in anterior-posterior direction, respectively. Results suggest different strategies between the two conditions to prepare for the swing phase of gait.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.conscientiabeam.com/journal/90/abstract/3521 (application/pdf)
http://www.conscientiabeam.com/journal/90/abstract/3521 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pkp:josres:2015:p:77-88

DOI: 10.18488/journal.90/2015.2.3/90.3.77.88

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Sports Research is currently edited by Sanele Phillip (Editorial Office)

More articles in Journal of Sports Research from Conscientia Beam 2637 E Atlantic Blvd #43110 Pompano Beach, FL 33062, USA.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editorial Office ().

 
Page updated 2019-08-25
Handle: RePEc:pkp:josres:2015:p:77-88