Considerations about mediation status in Romania, after declaring unconstitutional the mandatory information
Drago? Marian Radulescu ()
Additional contact information
Drago? Marian Radulescu: Legal Research Institute Acad. Andrei Radulescu
Social-Economic Debates, 2014, vol. 3, issue 2, 38-46
In human society has existed, throughout his evolution and development, various conflicts between its members, but regardless of the reason peoples always tried to find the best solution to resolve, peacefully, their problems. In modern society there is an attempt to combine between courts of justice with jurisdiction over the administration of justice and mediation. Thus we believe that resolving disputes through mediation is becoming increasingly used in Romania, due to low cost and rapidity with which a solution was obtained. Citizens have the possibility to choose to resolve disputes through mediation, without giving up the opportunity to address to the court, if is not satisfied with the result of mediation. This study attempts to discover the impact it has on declaring as unconstitutional the compulsory mediation inform about the benefits of mediation.
Keywords: Dispute; the court of justice; mediation; solving through mediation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sdb:social:v:3:y:2014:i:2:p:38-46
Access Statistics for this article
Social-Economic Debates is currently edited by Cristina Balaceanu
More articles in Social-Economic Debates from Association for Entreprenorial Spirit Promotion
Series data maintained by Adi Sava ().