The National Football League season wins total betting market: The impact of heuristics on behavior
Linda M. Woodland () and
Additional contact information
Linda M. Woodland: Department of Accounting and Finance, 406 Owen Building, College of Business, Ypsilanti, MI 48197, USA
Southern Economic Journal, 2015, vol. 82, issue 1, 38-54
Sports and racetrack betting markets have been investigated by researchers for more than 50 years. Many authors have argued that the observed biases and inefficiencies in these markets are a consequence of bettors incorrectly assessing the objective probabilities that favorites or underdogs will win. This article is the first examination of the National Football League season wins total over/under betting market where the designations of favorite and longshot do not apply. The market is found to be highly inefficient, providing several opportunities for profitable wagering. We believe these inefficiencies are a consequence of the representativeness heuristic. Most significantly, there is evidence that bettors, when considering teams with strong records in the previous season, overreact to historical performance and fail to recognize the statistical phenomenon of regression to the mean.
JEL-codes: G14 L83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:82:1:y:2015:p:38-54
Access Statistics for this article
Southern Economic Journal is currently edited by Laura Razzolini
More articles in Southern Economic Journal from Southern Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Laura Razzolini ().