REACHing for PFAS solutions: how two communities responded to drinking water contamination

Kimberly K. Garrett (), Kira Mok, Phil Brown, Laurel Schaider, Martha Powers, Maia Fitzstevens, Andrea Amico, Cheryl Osimo, Alissa Cordner and Courtney Carignan
Additional contact information
Kimberly K. Garrett: Northeastern University
Kira Mok: Northeastern University
Phil Brown: Northeastern University
Laurel Schaider: Silent Spring Institute
Martha Powers: Northeastern University
Maia Fitzstevens: Silent Spring Institute
Andrea Amico: Testing For Pease
Cheryl Osimo: Massachusetts Breast Cancer Coalition
Alissa Cordner: Whitman College
Courtney Carignan: Michigan State University

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2025, vol. 15, issue 4, No 1, 733-749

Abstract: Abstract Across the USA, communities have discovered per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) contamination of water supplies, and local responses have varied widely in terms of community involvement and the reaction of government agencies. This research aims to better understand the factors that influence community responses to PFAS contamination by comparing the experiences of two communities impacted by such contamination, Pease Tradeport in Portsmouth, NH, and Hyannis MA. Using 40 in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews with community members from the Pease Tradeport and Hyannis, we compare two cases of impacts and responses to PFAS contamination and their involvement in PFAS health research. We found differences in the extent and types of local activism, broader awareness of local PFAS contamination, and the responses of town, regional, and state agencies. Community experiences were strongly influenced by the source of PFAS contamination and the activity of local and state legislators. These case studies show how the work of a fairly small number of residents can generate important knowledge and contribute to local and national outcomes, including drinking water regulation and medical guidelines. However, structural barriers exist to community action, often related to environmental justice inequities; similar levels of community action may lead to different outcomes. By investigating how affected parties discover and act on contamination, how government agencies respond to contamination, influences on the financing of cleanup, and identifying effective advocacy approaches, these results can be used to inform and guide other affected communities when navigating the discovery of environmental contamination.

Keywords: Environmental Justice; Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS); Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF); Environmental health literacy; Contaminated communities; Community-based participatory research (CBPR) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-024-00994-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:15:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s13412-024-00994-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13412

DOI: 10.1007/s13412-024-00994-2

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences is currently edited by Walter A. Rosenbaum

More articles in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences from Springer, Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().