The minimum required rate of return
Samih Antoine Azar
Applied Financial Economics Letters, 2008, vol. 4, issue 2, 137-139
There is a puzzle in financial economics, called risk-free rate puzzle, named after Weil (1989). This puzzle consists of the observation that the risk-free rate is too low to be explained by actual consumption behaviour. Building upon previous research, and applying the concept of minimum compensation with expected utility, this article finds an equilibrium risk-free rate of 0.2% in real terms compared to an actual real risk-free rate of around 1%. Therefore, the puzzle is reversed; the actual risk-free rate is too high to describe investor sentiment.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article& ... 40C6AD35DC6213A474B5 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:apfelt:v:4:y:2008:i:2:p:137-139
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Applied Financial Economics Letters is currently edited by Mark Taylor
More articles in Applied Financial Economics Letters from Taylor and Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().