Being unbusinesslike. Financing strategy at the Great Exhibition

Stephen P. Walker

Business History, 2025, vol. 67, issue 7, 1904-1927

Abstract: This study examines financing in an alternative organisation – the Royal Commission for the Great Exhibition of 1851. Business aspects of the Great Exhibition have received limited attention. In contrast to the prevailing assumption that financing strategy was characterised by triumphant interventions, it is suggested that financial planning for the exhibition was problematic, and characterised by structural deficiencies, inattentive leadership, inadequate review, inconsistent approaches to assessing financing needs, unsystematic searches for financing solutions, and decision-making overly focused on minimising the personal risk of the Commissioners. It is concluded that the performance of the wealthy luminaries who oversaw the financing of the Great Exhibition was less impressive and paternalistic than is often portrayed.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2024.2359721 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:bushst:v:67:y:2025:i:7:p:1904-1927

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/FBSH20

DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2024.2359721

Access Statistics for this article

Business History is currently edited by Professor John Wilson and Professor Steven Toms

More articles in Business History from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().