Is Corruption Good or Bad for FDI? Empirical Evidence from Asia, Africa and Latin America
Abdul Jalil Author-Email: Jalil.email@example.com and
Additional contact information
Abdul Jalil Author-Email: Jalil.firstname.lastname@example.org: Corresponding author School of Economics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan Author-Name: Amina Qureshi Author-Email: email@example.com
Panoeconomicus, 2016, vol. 63, issue 3, 259-271
This article revisits the relationship between corruption and Foreign Direct Investment inflows in a panel of 42 countries from 1984 to 2012 using pooled mean group estimator in a dynamic heterogeneous panel setting using Westerlund and ARDL panel cointegration tests where the estimations are carried out by three different estimators: the pooled mean group (PMG), mean group (MG), and the dynamic fixed effect (DFE) estimators in order to examine both the long- and short-term effects of corruption on FDI inflows. The results suggest that corruption has a positive impact on FDI inflows in the case of Asia and Africa; and a negative impact in the case of Latin America.
Keywords: FDI; Corruption; Panel data. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.panoeconomicus.rs/casopis/2016_3/01%20A ... 20Mete%20Feridun.pdf
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:voj:journl:v:63:y:2016:i:3:p:259-271
Access Statistics for this article
Panoeconomicus is currently edited by Kosta Josifidis
More articles in Panoeconomicus from Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivana Horvat ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).