Tom Hertel’s influence and its lessons about academic inquiry
Russell Hillberry and
No 283571, Working papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project
Fields of academic inquiry differ in their preferred forms of output, in the ways in which knowledge is accumulated and stored, and so in the ways that academic influence is measured. We compare Tom Hertelâ€™s research record to other international economists of his generation in order to illustrate the unique breadth and influence of his work, and of the GTAP project broadly. We then provide an analytical framework that helps explain the evolution of the field of international economics from a tool-use standpoint. This framework helps us to assess the academic productivity gains from creating the GTAP model and consortium. It also provides a possible answer to a significant puzzle: why is GTAP increasingly influential in the physical and biological sciences, but less so within the international economics community?
Keywords: Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hpe and nep-int
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Tom Hertel’s influence and its lessons about academic inquiry (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:pugtwp:283571
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().