Altruism or Artefact? A Note on Dictator Game Giving
No 2005-10, Discussion Papers from The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham
Experimental dictator games have been used to explore unselfish behaviour. Evidence is presented here, however, that subjects’ generosity can be reversed by allowing them to take money from a partner. Dictator game giving therefore does not stem from orthodox social preferences. It can be interpreted plausibly as an artefact of experimentation. Alternatively the evaluation of an action depends on the composition of the choice set. Implications of these possibilities are explored for experimental methodology and charitable donations respectively. The artefact interpretation is empirically superior, and implies that researchers should investigate demand characteristics of experimental protocols.
Keywords: altruism; artificiality; experiments; methodology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 C70 D63 D64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp, nep-gth and nep-soc
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Working Paper: Altruism or Artefact? A Note on Dictator Game Giving (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdx:dpaper:2005-10
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Suzanne Robey ().