Coordinating Bank Failure Costs and Financial Stability
Iman Lelyveld and
DNB Working Papers from Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department
Banking groups have become increasingly multinational but the institutional infrastructure to deal with solvency or liquidity problems is still largely national. This might lead to financial instability if national authorities do not internalise externalities abroad. Recently ex-ante burden sharing agreements have been established (e.g. EFSF), but little empirical work has been done on potential costs and benefits of such agreements. We estimate the costs and benefits of financial stability support for large, internationally active banks under several proposed agreements. We show costs according to the 'national solution', where only home authorities inject capital, as our benchmark. 'Specific' sharing agreements would be redistributive at the expense of smaller and East European countries (not home to large cross-border banking groups). The 'general fund' mechanism will smooth costs across countries but may lead to unequal redistribution of costs. We also show that coordinating bank failure costs may bring about financial stability benefits.
Keywords: Burden sharing; crisis resolution; cross-border banks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F55 G18 G21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ban
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dnb:dnbwpp:306
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in DNB Working Papers from Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Richard Heuver ().