Contingent convertibles: Can the market handle them?
Iman Lelyveld and
Sweder van Wijnbergen ()
DNB Working Papers from Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department
The recent financial crisis has led to the introduction of contingent convertible instruments (CoCos) in the capital framework for banks. Although CoCos can provide benefits, such as automatic recapitalization of troubled banks, their inherent risks raise questions about whether they increase the safety of the banking system. We show that concerns about CoCos in just a single bank can result in the decline of an entire market, with investors apparently unable to distinguish safe from risky bonds. In times of market-panic, investors tend to rely on credit ratings instead of estimating the real risks of missing coupon payments. We provide several recommendations to improve the capital requirements regime for banks.
Keywords: Contagion; Contingent Convertible Capital; Systemic Risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G01 G21 G32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ban
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Contingent Convertibles: Can the Market handle them? (2017)
Working Paper: Contingent Convertibles: Can the Market Handle them? (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dnb:dnbwpp:572
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in DNB Working Papers from Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Richard Heuver ().