NILS Working paper no. 168. Enterprise bargaining and productivity
Keith Jackson Hancock
No 26070, NILS Working Papers from National Institute of Labour Studies
There can be no certainty about the productivity effects of enterprise bargaining, because the counterfactual situation is and will remain unknown. That said, I contend that there are good grounds for doubting that enterprise bargaining contributed much, if anything, to productivity; still less to ongoing productivity growth. These grounds are: 1. At most, there was a four-year boost in productivity whose timing does conceivably match the introduction and spread of enterprise bargaining. The boost has not endured. 2. If the four-year boost was policy-induced, there were other changes of policy in the late 1980s and early 1990s that may have been more important than the shift to enterprise bargaining. 3. When the productivity data are dissected to the industry level, it is hard to identify any large movements in productivity that could reasonably be ascribed to enterprise bargaining. Wholesale trade is a possible exception. The records of some major industries, notably mining and electricity, gas and water, suggest that much stronger influences have been at work.
Keywords: Industrial relations; Wages; Productivity; Labour (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: Hancock, K. 2011. Enterprise bargaining and productivity. Working Paper No 168
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fli:wpaper:26070
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NILS Working Papers from National Institute of Labour Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Rupali Saikia ().