Bond Restructuring and Moral Hazard; Are Collective Action Clauses Costly?
Torbjorn I. Becker,
Anthony Richards () and
Yunyong Thaicharoen ()
No 01/92, IMF Working Papers from International Monetary Fund
Many official groups have endorsed the wider use by emerging market borrowers of contract clauses which allow for a qualified majority of bondholders to restructure repayment terms in the event of financial distress. Some have argued that such clauses will be associated with moral hazard and increased borrowing costs. This paper addresses this question empirically using primary and secondary market yields and finds no evidence that the presence of collective action clauses increases yields for either higher- or lower-rated issuers. By implication, the perceived benefits from easier restructuring are at least as large as any costs from increased moral hazard.
Keywords: International financial markets; Collective action clauses; Moral hazard; Emerging markets; Bond yields; Bond restructuring, contract design, law, bonds, bond, bondholders, International Lending and Debt Problems, (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Bond restructuring and moral hazard: are collective action clauses costly? (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:imf:imfwpa:01/92
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IMF Working Papers from International Monetary Fund International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC USA. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jim Beardow ().