Gross National Happiness and Macroeconomic Indicators in the Kingdom of Bhutan
Sriram Balasubramanian and
Paul Cashin ()
No 19/15, IMF Working Papers from International Monetary Fund
This paper examines the origins and use of the concept of Gross National Happiness (or subjective well-being) in the Kingdom of Bhutan, and the relationship between measured well-being and macroeconomic indicators. While there are only a few national surveys of Gross National Happiness in Bhutan, the concept has been used to guide public policymaking for the country’s various Five-Year Plans. Consistent with the Easterlin Paradox, available evidence indicates that Bhutan’s rapid increase in national income is only weakly associated with increases in measured levels of well-being. It will be important for Bhutan to undertake more frequent Gross National Happiness surveys and evaluations, to better build evidence for comovement of well-being and macroeconomic concepts such as real national income.
Keywords: Gross domestic product; National income; Health; Population; Economic systems; Economic growth; Economic models; International financial markets; real income,gross national happiness,Equity,Justice,Inequality,and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement,General,real GDP,government of Bhutan,FYP,macroeconomic indicator (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hap and nep-hpe
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:imf:imfwpa:19/15
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IMF Working Papers from International Monetary Fund International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC USA. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jim Beardow ().