What is the Normative Basis for Selecting the Measure of 'Average' Preferences for Use in Social Choices?
Nancy Devlin (),
Koonal Shah () and
Research Papers from Office of Health Economics
The aim of this paper is to consider what normative arguments might exist for advocating the use of any given measure of the average in the context of health state values. We begin by providing examples of the importance and implications of the choice of the measure of central tendency in stated preference studies (including both EQ-5D values and corresponding issues in the willingness to pay literature). Then, drawing on the theory of social choice, voting models and welfare economics, we consider the criteria that are available for judging the 'goodness' of alternative approaches to aggregation, and evaluate their relevance to the selection of the measure of average EQ-5D values.
Keywords: Measuring; and; valuing; outcomes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hpe and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ohe.org/system/files/private/publicati ... ences%29%20FINAL.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ohe:respap:001798
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Research Papers from Office of Health Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Publications Manager ().