EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparing the UK EQ-5D-3L and the English EQ-5D-5L Value Sets

B. Mulhern, Yan Feng (), Koonal Shah (), B. van Hout, B. Janssen, M. Herdman and Nancy Devlin ()

Research Papers from Office of Health Economics

Abstract: Three EQ-5D value sets (the EQ-5D-3L, crosswalk and EQ-5D-5L) are now available for cost utility analysis in the UK and/or England. The value sets' characteristics differ, and it is important to systematically assess the implications of these differences for the value generated. The aim of this paper is to compare the characteristics of the three value sets. In this Research Report we analyse and compare the predicted values from each of the three value sets, and also compare EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L data from patients who completed both measures. We find there are systematic differences in the distribution of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L value sets. The EQ-5D-5L values are higher than the EQ-5D-3L values for matched states, and the overall range, and therefore differences between adjacent states is smaller than for the EQ-5D-3L. There are similar differences between the EQ-5D-5L and crosswalk value sets. In the patient data, the EQ-5D-5L value set produces higher values across all of the conditions included, and the differences are generally significant. There is some evidence that the value sets rank different health conditions in a similar order of severity, particularly for the most and least severe conditions. A revised version of this paper has been published in Pharmacoeconomics and can be downloaded from - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40273-018-0628-3 Please cite as - Mulhern, B., Feng, Y., Shah, K., Janssen, M.F., Herdman, M., van Hout, B. and Devlin, N., 2018. Comparing the UK EQ-5D-3L and English EQ-5D-5L Value Sets. Pharmacoeconomics, 36(6), pp.699-713.

Keywords: Incentivising; quality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
Date: 2017-03-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ohe.org/system/files/private/publicati ... %2017-2%20210317.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Comparing the UK EQ-5D-3L and English EQ-5D-5L Value Sets (2018) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ohe:respap:001821

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Papers from Office of Health Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Publications Manager ().

 
Page updated 2020-01-10
Handle: RePEc:ohe:respap:001821