EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Politics of Progressive Income Taxation with Incentive Effects

Philippe De Donder () and Jean Hindriks ()

No 416, Working Papers from Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance

Abstract: This paper studies majority voting over non-linear income taxes when individuals respond to taxation by substituting untaxable leisure to taxable labor (incentive effects). We first show that voting cycle over progressive and regressive taxes is inevitable. This is because the middle-class can always lower its tax burden at the expense of the rich by imposing progressive taxes (convex tax function) while the rich and the poor can reduce their tax burden by imposing regressive taxes (concave tax function). We then investigate three solutions to this cycling problem: (i) reducing the policy space to the policies that are ideal for some voter; (ii) weakening the voting equilibrium concept; (iii) assuming parties also care about the size of their majority. The main results is that progressivity emerges as a voting equilibrium if there is a lack of polarization at the extremes of the income distribution. Interestingly the poor would prefer regressive taxes.

Keywords: Majority voting; Income taxation; Tax progressivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pbe, nep-pol and nep-pub
Date: 2000-07
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.qmul.ac.uk/sef/media/econ/research/workingpapers/archive/wp416.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The politics of progressive income taxation with incentive effects (2003) Downloads
Working Paper: The politics of progressive income taxation with incentive effects (2003)
Working Paper: The Politics of Progressive Income Taxation with Incentive Effects (2000)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:wp416

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nicholas Owen ().

 
Page updated 2018-12-05
Handle: RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:wp416