A Comparison of Methods for the Construction of Composite Coincident and Leading Indexes for the UK
Andrea Carriero and
No 590, Working Papers from Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance
In this paper we provide an overview of recent developments in the methodology for the construction of composite coincident and leading indexes, and apply them to the UK. In particular, we evaluate the relative merits of factor based models and Markov switching specifications for the construction of coincident and leading indexes. For the leading indexes we also evaluate the performance of probit models and pooling. The results indicate that alternative methods produce similar coincident indexes, while there are more marked di.erences in the leading indexes.
Keywords: Forecasting; Business cycles; Leading indicators; Coincident indicators; Turning points (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E32 E37 C53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cba, nep-ecm, nep-eec, nep-ets, nep-for and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: A comparison of methods for the construction of composite coincident and leading indexes for the UK (2007)
Working Paper: A Comparison of Methods for the Construction of Composite Coincident and Leading Indexes for the UK (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:wp590
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nicholas Owen ().