Tactical Voting and Voter's Sophistication in British Elections
Stéphane Dupraz (),
Daniel Müller and
Lionel Page ()
No 11, QuBE Working Papers from QUT Business School
Although tactical voting attracts a great deal of attention, it is very hard to measure as it requires knowledge of both individuals' voting choices as well as their unobserved preferences. In this paper, we present a simple empirical strategy to nonparametrically identify tactical voting patterns directly from balloting results. This approach allows us to study the magnitude and direction of strategic voting as well as to verify which information voters and parties take into account to determine marginal constituencies. We show that tactical voting played a signiﬁcant role in the 2010 election, mainly for Liberal-Democratic voters supporting Labour. Moreover, our results suggest that voters seem to form their expectations based on a national swing in vote shares rather than newspaper guides published in the main media outlets or previous election outcomes. We also present some evidence that suggests that campaign spending is not driving tactical voting.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pol
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://external-apps.qut.edu.au/business/documents ... ting_DM_V3_Jan13.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qut:qubewp:wp011
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in QuBE Working Papers from QUT Business School
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dipa Sarkar (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .