Causal pluralism and mixed methods in the analysis of poverty dynamics
No 115, WIDER Working Paper Series from World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER)
This paper examines the relationship between poverty dynamics, causal pluralism, and mixed method research approaches.It reviews the nature and significance of the shift from the analysis of poverty status to poverty dynamics, discusses different approaches to causal reasoning and causal inference in philosophy and the social sciences, and presents empirical examples of mixed method studies of poverty dynamics.It concludes with a case for causal pluralism and mixed methods on grounds that empirical validation/adjudication is imperfect, knowledge is partial, and many causal systems are inherently complex.
Keywords: Mixed methods; Poverty Dynamics; Measurement (Poverty); Methodology (Poverty) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec and nep-hme
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/Publi ... r/PDF/wp2018-115.pdf
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp2018-115
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in WIDER Working Paper Series from World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mauricio Roa Grisales ().