Attitude toward imprecise information

Thibault Gajdos, Takashi Hayashi (), Jean-Marc Tallon and Jean-Christophe Vergnaud
Additional contact information
Thibault Gajdos: CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Takashi Hayashi: Department of Economics, University of Texas - University of Texas at Austin [Austin]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper presents an axiomatic model of decision making which incorporates objective but imprecise information. We axiomatize a decision criterion of the multiple priors (or maxmin expected utility) type. The model achieves two primary objectives. First, it explains how subjective belief varies with information. Second, it identifies an explicit attitude toward imprecision that underlies usual hedging axioms. Information is assumed to take the form of a probability-possibility set, that is, a set P of probability measures on the state space. The decision maker is told that the true probability law lies in P. She is assumed to rank pairs of the form (P,f) where P is a probability-possibility set and f is an act mapping states into outcomes. The representation result delivers multiple-priors utility at each probability-possibility set. There is a mapping that gives for each probability-possibility set the subjective set of priors. This allows both subjective expected utility when the subjective set of priors is reduced to a singleton and the other extreme where the decision maker takes the worst case scenario in the entire probability-possibility set. We show that the relation «more averse to imprecision» is characterized by inclusion of the sets of priors, irrespective of the utility functions that capture risk attitude. We characterize, under extra axioms, a more precise functional form, in which the subjective set of priors is obtained by (i) solving for the «mean value» of the probability-possibility set and (ii) shrinking the probability-possibility set toward the mean value to a degree determined by preference.

Keywords: Steiner point; Imprecise information; imprecision aversion; multiple priors; croyances multiples; Information imprécise (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-07
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00130179
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Published in 2006

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00130179/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Attitude toward imprecise information (2008)
Working Paper: Attitude toward imprecise information (2008)
Working Paper: Attitude toward imprecise information (2008)
Working Paper: Attitude toward imprecise information (2008)
Working Paper: Attitude toward imprecise information (2006)
Working Paper: Attitude toward imprecise information (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00130179

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().