Judge:Don't Vote!

Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki ()
Additional contact information
Rida Laraki: X-DEP-ECO - Département d'Économie de l'École Polytechnique - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: This article explains why the traditional model of the theory of social choice misrepresents reality, it cannot lead to acceptable methods of ranking and electing in any case, and a more realistic model leads inevitably to one method of ranking and electing—majority judgment—that best meets the traditional criteria of what constitutes a good method.

Keywords: Arrow's paradox; Condorcet's paradox; Majority judgment; Skating; Social choice; Strategic manipulation; Voting; Paradoxe d'Arrow; Paradoxe de Condorcet; Patinage artistique; Choix social; Jugement majoritaire; Manipulation stratégique; Vote (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-11-18
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00536968
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-00536968/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Judge: Don't Vote ! (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00536968

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().