Why the split of payroll taxation between firms and workers matters for macroeconomic stability

Simon Voigts

No 2014-061, SFB 649 Discussion Papers from Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk

Abstract: Conventional wisdom states that the statutory split of payroll taxation between firms and workers is of no macroeconomic relevance, because the tax incidence is fully determined by the market structure. This paper breaks with this view by establishing a theoretical link between the statutory split and the average volatility of prices and wages. It is shown that shifting taxation towards workers significantly reduces the volatility in nominal variables without entailing long-run redistribution. The gain in stability of prices and wages reduces inefficiencies in the equilibrium allocation of the stochastic model and thereby reduces welfare costs of business cycle fluctuations. In a standard DSGE model, welfare costs un- der the full taxation of firms are 11.25% larger than under the full taxation of workers.

Keywords: payroll taxes; social security; business cycles; automatic stabilizers; optimal taxation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E30 E32 E60 H21 H55 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/107917/1/799281786.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:sfb649:sfb649dp2014-061

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SFB 649 Discussion Papers from Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().