Reforming the Stability and Growth Pact

Anthony Annett, Jörg Decressin and Michael Deppler

No 2005/002, IMF Policy Discussion Papers from International Monetary Fund

Abstract: A rules-based fiscal framework, such as the EU’s Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), can be an important bulwark against short-sighted policies. Although policies have improved following the SGP’s adoption, shortcomings remain. These, however, are rooted in the policies rather than the rules, where few changes seem necessary. Specifically, the Excessive Deficit Procedure needs a stronger focus on policies rather than outcomes, while staying operationally simple and transparent. Furthermore, reforms are needed to foster time-consistent national policies, budgetary transparency, and ownership of the Pact. Accordingly, parliaments should debate national Stability Programs and national fiscal councils should review these programs for parliaments.

Keywords: PDP; excessive deficit; SGP reform debate; deficit target; reduction path; country ownership; SGP regulation; Fiscal policy; fiscal rules; political economy; CBS rule; deficit bias; Data processing; Fiscal governance; Structural reforms; Europe (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 28
Date: 2005-02-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=18031 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:imf:imfpdp:2005/002

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/pubs/ord_info.htm

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IMF Policy Discussion Papers from International Monetary Fund International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC USA. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Akshay Modi ().