EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Gender Biases in Student Evaluations of Teachers

Anne Boring

SciencePo Working papers Main from HAL

Abstract: This paper uses a unique database from a French university to analyze gender biases in student evaluations of teachers (SETs). The results of generalized ordered logit regressions and fixed-effects models suggest that male teachers tend to receive higher SET scores because of students' gender biases. Male students in particular express a strong bias in their favor: male students are approximately 30% more likely to give an excellent overall satisfaction score to male teachers compared to female teachers. The different teaching dimensions that students value in men and women tend to correspond to gender stereotypes. The teaching dimensions for which students perceive a comparative advantage for women (such as course preparation and organization) tend to be more time-consuming for the teacher, compared to the teaching dimensions that students value more in men (such as class leadership skills). Men are perceived as being more knowledgeable (male gender stereotype) and obtain higher SET scores than women, but students appear to learn as much from women as from men, suggesting that female teachers are as knowledgeable as men. Finally, I find that if women increased students' continuous assessment grades by 7.5% compared to the grades given by their male colleagues, they could obtain similar overall satisfaction scores as men. Yet, women do not act on this incentive (men and women give similar continuous assessment grades), suggesting that female teachers are unaware of students' gender biases. These biases have strong negative consequences for female academics, who may spend more time on teaching to try to obtain high SET scores, reducing time available for research. The results suggest that better teaching is not necessarily measured by SETs.

Keywords: Incentives; Teaching effectiveness; Student evaluations of teaching; Gender biases and stereotypes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-04-01
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03470161
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03470161/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Gender Biases in student evaluations of teachers (2015) Downloads
Working Paper: Gender Biases in Student Evaluations of Teachers (2015) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-03470161

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SciencePo Working papers Main from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Contact - Sciences Po Departement of Economics ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-03470161