Job losses and political acceptability of climate policies: why the ‘job-killing’ argument is so persistent and how to overturn it

Francesco Vona

SciencePo Working papers Main from HAL

Abstract: Political acceptability is an essential issue in choosing appropriate climate policies. Sociologists and behavioural scientists recognize the importance of selecting environmental policies that have broad political support, while economists tend to compare different instruments first on the basis of their efficiency, and then by assessing their distributional impacts and thus their political acceptability. This paper examines case-study and empirical evidence that the job losses ascribed (correctly or incorrectly) to climate policies have substantial impacts on the willingness of affected workers to support these policies. In aggregate, the costs of these losses are significantly smaller than the benefits, both in terms of health and, probably, of labour market outcomes, but the losses are concentrated in specific areas, sectors and social groups that have been hit hard by the great recession and international competition. Localized contextual effects, such as peer group pressure, and politico-economic factors, such as weakened unions and tightened government budgets, amplify the strength and the persistence of the ‘job-killing' argument. Compensating for the effects of climate policies on ‘left-behind' workers appears to be the key priority to increase the political acceptability of such policies, but the design of compensatory policies poses serious challenges.

Keywords: Climate policies; Employment impacts; Distributional impacts; Collective action problems; Amplification mechanisms; Political acceptability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-02
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03403629
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in Climate Policy, 2019, 19 (4), pp.524 - 532. ⟨10.1080/14693062.2018.1532871⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03403629/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Job losses and political acceptability of climate policies: why the ‘job-killing’ argument is so persistent and how to overturn it (2019)
Working Paper: Job losses and political acceptability of climate policies: why the ‘job-killing’ argument is so persistent and how to overturn it (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:spmain:hal-03403629

DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1532871

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SciencePo Working papers Main from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Contact - Sciences Po Departement of Economics ().