Consumption Commitments and Risk Preferences
Raj Chetty and
Adam Szeidl
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2007, vol. 122, issue 2, 831-877
Abstract:
Many households devote a large fraction of their budgets to "consumption commitments"—goods that involve transaction costs and are infrequently adjusted. This paper characterizes risk preferences in an expected utility model with commitments. We show that commitments affect risk preferences in two ways: (1) they amplify risk aversion with respect to moderate-stake shocks, and (2) they create a motive to take large-payoff gambles. The model thus helps resolve two basic puzzles in expected utility theory: the discrepancy between moderate-stake and large-stake risk aversion and lottery playing by insurance buyers. We discuss applications of the model such as the optimal design of social insurance and tax policies, added worker effects in labor supply, and portfolio choice. Using event studies of unemployment shocks, we document evidence consistent with the consumption adjustment patterns implied by the model.
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (265)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1162/qjec.122.2.831 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Consumption Commitments and Risk Preferences (2006) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:122:y:2007:i:2:p:831-877.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva
More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().