Does the Open Economy Assumption Really Mean That Labor Bears the Burden of a Capital Income Tax?

Jane G. Gravelle () and Kent Smetters ()

Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 2006, vol. 6, issue 1, pages 1548-1548

Abstract: The conventional view holds that domestic labor, not domestic capital, bears most of the long-run burden of a corporate income tax in an open economy due to the ability of capital to move across borders. This result assumes that domestic and foreign products (as well as investments) are perfect substitutes. This paper includes imperfect product substitution within a multi-sector open-economy model, and shows that much of the burden may fall on capital. To be sure, if savings falls sufficiently, much of the burden shifts to labor, but this fact also holds in a closed economy. Hence, the debate about tax incidence must focus more on the savings response and less on whether an economy is open or closed.

Keywords: corporate income tax; incidence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
Note: oai:bepress:bejeap-1548
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1548&context=bejeap (application/pdf)
Subscription to the journal may be required to access full texts.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bep:eapadv:v:6:y:2006:i:1:p:1548-1548

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.bepress.com/subscriptions.html

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy from Berkeley Electronic Press
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().